問下有清楚VigilVendor（城堡販賣mod）開發者出什麽事情了？

冬風

我把解釋貼過來好了
做個備份
好像是有人不滿作者是基於 拿到10個類似積分或加分 之後做一次更新
: m% X. ~% A0 A+ g# W認為作者藉此營利之類的
9 _" r% i6 [3 i& c

---

1 ~5 ?/ U0 z  F

" t* j# A; D4 t Inverness 22:00, 30 April 2010   
: E; ]0 |  ?) }1 p! _9 T' C+ i   
        "This mod is an endorsements for updates mod.
Every 10 endorsements I will release a new update to the mod! The update will always be large enough so the user has a reason to update and so People don't feel cheated."

. m+ q$ C) @: D) E' lI'll endorse you because I want to, not because you demand it or bribe me for it.
8 x% P+ U/ q6 ?) Z( |9 o
Just because of that I'm not going to endorse your mod.

, G4 S# L8 S$ N, p& k# T
4 O, r3 b. O. l- g
9 S1 C( d  f7 ^" y1 {& L6 P
   

+ \& Q8 t) I" H0 Z/ r4 s: n
; R4 t+ K' v7 U: l1 t* |
" `. u" h4 B* x; W7 P/ ^. M
5 c% k& X5 O$ ^0 e6 I
& ]% W& }+ Y1 t/ ^$ {. y" G+ N
' K% z+ b3 V' a6 Q$ C$ t5 v
: Z. f4 c! V+ A& Q5 `4 w( n


! k2 L: j0 Z& q# V8 @
: A9 a  z5 L" T# I




! F$ E6 F' e5 ~            RetryAgain
22:30, 30 April 2010   
   
7 k: T: r* |! J# ]: `+ j% ?        Inverness is a idiot. He obviously doesn't realize that Noob is working really hard for the sake of others. No where in that quote is he bribing or demanding endorsements. He's just saying he'll update it if enough people are using and enjoy it. It's not like he gets money for your endorsement.
   
             buddah
; h2 n# P% y, G/ W0 b% r5 l

01:34, 1 May 2010        
4 {4 ~2 M! R3 D" d        
7 F% t. i7 R- r: AAdmin note:

We do not allow the solicitation of endorsements/votes/kudos

9 H  b( o# }5 r  ZIf you want to update it, update it.  If not then don't.
5 {) n- k: G' G7 G; e- g
" x4 y, E4 }  C6 wTo make my point, this is now locked.

. N  k0 p7 ]& A"
The matter of people requesting others to rate and vote for their files as file of the month has been discussed several times within the staff forums over the years. With the introduction of the files of the month section authors have begun to notice that they can get more people to vote for their files if they ask people to do it, and provide a link to the process, at the top of their file description. Now, this was fine because we made no mention of whether it was allowed or not.

However I've decided to add in a few new checks on file ratings and votes to prevent authors from doing this from now on. Why you ask? Well, because only the people that are asking for votes are getting in to the top 5 of the files of the month section. This isn't a god awful terrible thing, but I'd rather every author had the oppurtunity to get their files in to the top sections without having to solicit votes and ratings from users.

This will be offset in the near future by a new feature that will allow users to better see what files they have and haven't rated and whether they have voted for a file of the month (with some gentle encouragement if they haven't). This functionality will go hand-in-hand with a complete overhaul of the rating system in general, due to be worked on after I've finished my 4th and final year of exams at university. I haven't got £15k in to debt with student loans to throw it all away now! "


http://thenexusforums.com/index.php?showtopic=124689&st=0&p=1051472&hl=votes&fromsearch=1&#entry1051472

Buddah
; c5 {0 ~/ N  B- a' R
" f! z5 c5 ]  F   


  k8 z/ A5 s) |9 M6 q' j" O3 J

- Z& z' ^5 N+ {8 w1 O1 _
5 C  T8 F( F9 h: |& Q

5 E6 I1 p5 V" x( N- A8 ^- D/ C( O5 [
6 r; f/ {) b7 d9 F5 S$ C



# Z8 K' n& y2 }8 i# J0 x3 e4 |1 M



" s/ T+ e. V6 h: e! ~
# u9 p( ~0 P. I$ w  f# J

9 x' g9 A  F  Y/ j0 `: G2 \6 e
" S7 C/ Y+ B* y& p4 G3 f; A

$ J! f& R7 O- n. Q- t

, F0 G5 w8 q# n+ a/ M
& j5 F) h( {4 v- X. s' P6 H8 `
0 g4 U4 w/ B- \$ f$ Q/ D' v5 q" l! K( K

. J/ e; u+ B/ z, U. y$ [9 P' i




( ^5 o: {$ C! T+ w  ~7 {
Vagrant0        01:44, 1 May 2010        
- ]0 j$ X' u) _5 T     
quote  "Inverness is a idiot. He obviously doesn't realize that Noob is working really hard for the sake of others. No where in that quote is he bribing or demanding endorsements. He's just saying he'll update it if enough people are using and enjoy it. It's not like he gets money for your endorsement."

! N0 x0 a( ?3 S5 M: v
$ Y9 _  `7 g8 R" r9 R- K. YUnfortunately though, this is how the description can be interpreted. While the author doesn't get paid money, some do things like this just to either inflate their endorsements or to try and collect more fame for their project. The way this is presented is easy to misunderstand. If the author doesn't want people to get the wrong impression, they may wish to re-word their description or practices. However, as the author has so far had an update for every 10 endorsements thus far, their end of the deal is met. If someone decides to withhold their endorsement because they disagree with the practices, that is their business, and I can't do anything to force them to make such an endorsement. I personally disagree with holding updates ransom, or basing interest of a mod solely on endorsements, but it's not my call. You reap what you sow.
- t1 \, K+ {8 H( N& b6 ]