奇幻遊戲社群

 找回密碼
 註冊
搜索
查看: 7908|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[分享] D&D官方陣營測試   [複製鏈接]

超級版主

徒勞的

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

閱讀權限
255
生命值
8805
法力值
8141
金幣
60373 G
聲望
819
1
發表於 2010-5-23 21:01:27 |顯示全部樓層
我也是絕對中立。(話說以前唸書時代時做的是混亂善良...)

Neutral

A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.

其實如果有認真去考慮內容對應實際體驗的話,我覺得一般來說多半是靠近中立的,而且越是去思考實踐問題的立場/方法,會覺得自己離所謂的英雄越遠......像我只是一個怕事又貪心的普通人。
遊戲本身並沒有功利目的,遊戲過程的本身就是遊戲的目的。by剩餘能量理論

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

手機版|奇幻遊戲社群

GMT+8, 2024-5-5 12:31

Powered by Discuz! X2

© 2001-2011 Comsenz Inc.

回頂部